Pages

Total Pageviews

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Janet Wendy Last - Performing Arts Critic

Wendy and I had the time of our lives in 1978-79, the sabbatical year I spent at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in Mid-Town Manhattan, New York City. We had a 2-bedroom apartment on the 18th floor of a co-op high-rise in Morningside Gardens, a complex of multi-ethnic co-op high-rise apartments that had been partly subsidized by the Rockefeller Foundation. We were at the corner of 123rd Street and Amsterdam Ave, looking west towards Riverside Church and North towards George Washington Bridge with views of both from our windows. I was editing the massive multi-author textbook of Public Health and Preventive Medicine eponymously known as Maxcy-Rosenau, and for the first few months I had a rather light work-load while I wrote my own chapters and waited for the team of friends, colleagues and former contributors to deliver their contributions. We rode our bikes all over Manhattan Island, exploring it from Battery Park at the south end looking towards the Statue of Liberty to the Cloisters, 13 miles north, where the Hudson River and the East River converged and coalesced before separating and going their own way again. Several times each week we went to Off-Off-Broadway theatres and other venues of performing arts; we went to galleries and open-air performances in Central Park and elsewhere; and during the week while I worked in my office, Wendy explored New York on her own by bike, bus or on foot. She filled two fat scrap books with theatre programs, brochures from art galleries and museums, and kept the used tickets in the scrap books if these were colourful and worth preserving. If costumes or sets were memorable, she sketched these also in her scrap books. She wrote her own personal critiques too, so here are some excerpts from these critiques, for 2 weeks in September 1978.

Sept 15: To St John's cathedral, Amsterdam Ave, for a magnificent mediaeval play with 16th Century instruments, masks, characters on stilts (she drew sketches of masks)

Sept 20: Mud men of Papua New Guinea; Dancers with faces covered by masks of mud (clay). A vivacious, energetic show with basic stamping, simple steps, dramatic leaps by the men & some good drama. Too much nasal monotone singing, slow action. Impressive head dresses & grass skirt costumes, bare bosoms and lovely white teeth.

Sept 22: Happy Birthday John. To Androcles and the Lion - G B Shaw at the No-Smoking Playhouse, a tiny shabby theatre; simple stage sets, primitive togas for costumes but a magnificent, cuddly horrendous lion. Excellent acting and singing, a really first rate performance; most enjoyable!  To the Russian Tea Room after the show. (She pasted our tickets in her scrap book with one word, "Expensive!") Posh red velvet seats, lots of brass samovars, sashed waiters & expensive menu. Red and white table cloths, real napkins, lamb specialty, just a glorified hamburger but v tasty. John's omelet good.

Sept 23: Long account of Cloisters with photos and drawings. In the evening, to the Drama Committee Theatre, You Never Can Tell. A rather shabby production with poorly altered costumes, awful singing & ineffective use of black stockinged white gloved rather plump mime, ballet girls who act as props, otherwise no scenery. Not a convincing evening except for the butler.

Sept 30: Browsed around antique fabric and book shops. Bought cushion cover material. Biked home than bus to Third Ave at 94th Street for dinner at the Cock-Eyed Clam. Superb fresh fish in tiny, crowded, noisy, happy restaurant. Very good value, $13 for two of us. Then watched street artists in Sheridan Sq, Greenwich Village.

The two fat scrap books go on like this through the rest of our wonderful year in the Big Apple. I'll add more later with scans of some of the sketches she drew to illustrate the text.



Wendy in our 18th Floor apartment in New York with some of the paintings she produced while we lived there.  I made the mobile from scraps of driftwood I picked up on the beach at Santa Barbara during our brief escape to California in the depth of winter 1978-79

Friday, April 27, 2012

Quirky Memories

There's a peculiar lump on the bottom left-hand corner of my bed, where Wendy taped foam rubber over the sharp metal edge of the bed frame, after she had gouged a piece of flesh from her shin for the third time since we got that bed. It had replaced the colonial four-poster we bought when we first came to live in Ottawa, but sold after she fractured her hip and for a year or so she was more comfortable in twin beds where I couldn't accidentally bump her hip if I rolled over. Wendy cared about the comfort of her lower extremities. I could run on for hours about bed socks. She disliked getting cold feet. When we lived in New York we took the subway to Kennedy Airport one cold winter morning, to discover when we got there that our flight had been cancelled because of the snow. We had a long wait in the architecturally exciting but draughty TWA terminal, and plenty of room to stretch out in the nearly deserted departure lounge while we waited several hours for the airport to reopen.  Wendy solved the problem of icy cold feet by slipping off her shoes and putting her fleece-lined gloves on her feet before she stretched out for a nap. It was an arresting sight that pulled up passers-by for a second look. I've always regretted not taking a photo as a permanent record of this eccentric but effective fashion statement. Wendy could never swallow pills as the rest of us do. Wrapping them in a spoonful of jam was a waste of time. Even when crushed and mixed with honey she somehow separated the fragments so the honey slipped down, leaving the unacceptable crumbs of the pill on her seemingly prehensile tongue. The only way that worked was to shove the pill down her gullet on the tip of her finger. It always made her gag, but it worked, though strangers who observed this procedure marvelled at it and probably remembered it for the rest of their lives.



Wendy, padded with several cushions, as Father Christmas at the Head Start kindergarten Christmas party, early 1970s











            A successful cure for cold feet
            495 Island Park Drive, Ottawa
            c 1971-72

Monday, April 23, 2012

Speculating about Edinburgh

My post last week about leaving Edinburgh was repetitive and a bit incoherent. It was cut and pasted from two versions of my memoirs without editing because I was in a hurry to post this episode and didn't take the time or make the effort to blend the two versions and do the essential editing. I've said it before: everything ever written, with the possible exception of the lord's prayer and the Gettysburg address, can be improved by editing. Another thing I've often said before is that whenever I go back to Edinburgh, or even merely think about Edinburgh, I wonder why we ever left. It doesn't take long to list some excellent reasons why the move made sense then and still does today. The most cogent is that Jonathan is alive and nearly 50 years old; if we'd stayed in Edinburgh he might have been dead before he was 10. The rest of the family have all done better here than if we had stayed in Scotland. It's idle fancy to speculate about how our lives might have evolved if we had made a different choice at some past decision point. Nonetheless it's fun to speculate and like everybody else I'll keep right on speculating.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Archives

Today I visited the University of Ottawa archives. It was an interesting visit. There are some memorabilia: keys to the front door of the building where the university was located when it opened in 1854, sports trophies, battered old musical instruments from a late 19th century band, a menu from a ceremonial banquet in the 1880s where the final items were brandy and cigars, and much more. In those days it was a religious college that evolved rather slowly at first then more rapidly after the end of the 1939-45 world war when the university opened up in several ways as a necessary condition to obtaining government funds. There were no women students or staff (other than domestic servants) until after the 1914-1918 world war.  Some of the early buildings were made of wood, and were destroyed in disastrous fires early in the 20th century. As for documents, senate meeting minutes and financial records are kept, but not historically significant correspondence of the sort that I offered, and sent along with much else to the National Archives of Canada when the University of Ottawa wasn't interested. I gave the archives my spare copy of the memorial volume I compiled and edited to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Faculty of Medicine in 1995. Unlike the battered copy in the archives, my copy is in mint condition, so the archivist was duly grateful to have this.

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Another life-altering decision


As we moved further into the 1960s it became clearer to Wendy and me that our contented and very happy lives in Edinburgh could not and would not continue indefinitely. With much help from a mortgage finance company we had ‘bought’ a lovely home ideally located next to an attractive park, conveniently close to the Usher Institute, to the rest of the University of Edinburgh and to the heart of the city of Edinburgh. But it was a constant struggle and an increasing concern that we could barely afford the city taxes, mortgage payments, rising inflation and costs of living at the standard we wanted to maintain. Rebecca had begun attending an excellent merchant company school, George Watson’s Ladies’ College, where she was getting a first class education. The fees were modest in comparison to private schools in England or Australia but were far from negligible. David needed to transfer very soon to a boys’ school of comparable standard and cost, and in due course, so would Jonathan.  We were far more concerned that Jonathan’s chances of survival into adult life quite literally depended on obtaining extremely advanced pediatric cardiac surgery that would be very costly, far beyond our financial means if we were to select one of the two centres in the world where the operative outcomes were the most favourable.  I had become very well known and respected in my professional field and was beginning to get invitations to join the staff of other medical schools, almost all of them in the USA, none, unfortunately, in Australia or New Zealand. Even the other medical schools in the UK were offering higher salaries and better fringe benefits than I was getting at the University of Edinburgh. If we moved to one of the US medical schools from which I received an invitation in 1968, Pittsburgh for instance, my salary would be double or more what I was getting in Edinburgh.   

In 1968, I was invited to two meetings in Australia. The first and more important was at the Australian National University, a conference on linkages between community-based primary care and academia. I had corresponded by then with Dick Scotton, an economist in Melbourne, who had followed my lead in studying medical manpower in Australia. It was rumoured that he and I were being considered as potential directors of a research centre for medical care and medical education at the Australian National University. Several senior people at ANU went out of their way to have conversations with me that amounted to interviews. But there were obstacles to the plan. The main obstacle was budget constraints that eventually ruled out the idea of the research centre (it did not materialize until 1988 when the National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health was established at ANU; NCEPH has done some of what we visualized at the 1968 Canberra conference but did not become a reality until 20 years later. Some of the research I had suggested in 1968 did not begin until almost 30 years later). Doubts about the viability of the rumoured national centre didn’t stop me having the time of my life on that return visit to Australia in 1968. The AMA/BMA congress in Sydney went well too, and as at the Canberra conference, I met many interesting people, notably Brian Barrett-Boyes, the Auckland based cardiac surgeon. I realized that Canberra, previously a boring little country village, was becoming a beautiful city. It was obvious that in a few years it would be a worth-while place to live. Wendy and I had several return visits to Canberra in later years, on several occasions staying there for a few weeks when I was a visiting professor. Each time it seemed to us that Canberra had become better than ever before as a place to live.

The other important event on that 1968 visit to Australia was helping my mother to wind up her independent life in a small town-house and move into an old folks’ home where she would spend the rest of her life. It was a trying experience and Wendy rose to it nobly, doing more than I to help dissect my mother’s important possessions (not necessarily the most valuable) from all that was expendable. A great deal was expendable, and an interesting insight into differing values between us and our sister-in-law Jenny was that Jenny consigned many things to a bonfire, packs of cards for instance, that we would have donated to a worthy cause. My mother had several precious heirlooms, and gave some of these to me; but a sad reflection on our financial status at that time is that I was obliged to sell them, for without the cash they yielded, we would not have been able to afford meals and overnight accommodation on our way home to Edinburgh, our financial resources were so stretched. Too late I realized that my mother’s contribution to our air fares to and from Australia was as much a curse as a blessing. There was nothing to spare for incidental expenses. My air fare and expenses were paid by my hosts at the two meetings at which I was invited to speak.  We would have been better off if the family had stayed in Edinburgh while I traveled to attend these meetings on my own.

We had to part from Boomer in 1968. He was a beautiful dog but thought he was a person and expressed his affection for all of us by jumping up on us and vigorous tail wagging. When we had to leave him on his own, he ate the furniture, and in the car he ate the seats. He loved and sought to protect delicate little Jonathan most of all but his exuberantly wagging tail was strong enough to knock Jonathan off his feet. Either Boomer or Jonathan had to go, so reluctantly we gave Boomer to a biochemist at the children’s hospital. I saw Boomer again on my way back to Ottawa from Indonesia in 1972. He had grown into a beautiful, sedate adult Labrador, no doubt benefiting from more rigorous and patient training than we had ever provided.

By the middle of1968, Wendy and I had reluctantly concluded that we could not survive in our lovely home in Edinburgh on my senior lecturer’s salary, even though it was at the top of the scale. I had been forced to sell my life insurance policies to make the payments on our mortgage. We would be forced to sell our home and settle for something more modest, might have to abandon the notion of sending the children to the fee-paying merchant company schools that provide an outstanding education in Scottish cities. Also looming ahead was the absolute necessity of costly life-saving cardiac surgery for Jonathan. The writing was on the wall: our financial future in Scotland was bleak.  But these gloomy thoughts were subliminal during what was on the whole a cheerful visit to Adelaide. It was wonderful for the children to meet their cousins in Adelaide and subsequently on the way home, their cousins, aunts, uncles and grandmother in New Zealand. It was wonderful for me to have some leisurely visits with much loved relatives, my Uncle Lester in particular, and my favourite cousins. Jenny, good-hearted and hospitable soul that she is, mounted a splendid family party; and I got around a great deal to visit many old friends including medical school classmates as well as almost all my relatives.



Adelaide and Ottawa Last families at Peter and Jenny Last's home in Adelaide, 1968














On the way home to Edinburgh, I stopped off in Seattle, where my friend John Lee, formerly Jerry Morris’s colleague in London, was my host; in Vancouver, where I visited Don Anderson; in Chicago, Case-Western Reserve in Cleveland, Washington DC, and Boston, where Vic Sidel whom I had met in Edinburgh and with whom in later years I often interacted, looked after me. Everywhere I was able to talk about my research on medical education and health care. It was a very good experience in every way, meeting old friends, making new ones, and getting a new look at many parts of North America, to which my thoughts had begun to stray again. It would solve our financial problems to move back to this hemisphere, where academic salaries were at least double the level of the UK. I dropped a few hints that I might respond to the right invitation, should one be forthcoming. Yet I was ambivalent; this was the summer of the Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King assassinations, of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago (I could smell the tear gas on the curtains when I stayed at the Conrad Hilton Hotel in Chicago two weeks after that convention). The violence, the corrupt political system, the shallow narcissism of American life, seemed worse than ever.

International experiences continued in 1969 when I went back to the USA to a conference on hospital discharge abstract systems and the statistical analysis of data they contained, not a sexy subject, but one that brought together a stimulating group of people, some already known to me, others I was meeting for the first time. The former included Donald Acheson, later chief medical officer of England and Wales, Kerr White, and my friend Mike Heasman from the Edinburgh Research and Intelligence Unit. The latter included Sid Shindell, later president of ATPM who was instrumental in the ATPM involvement with the Maxcy-Rosenau textbook of which I was to become editor-in-chief. Dave Sackett who had just gone to McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, and Howard Newcombe who had developed the Canadian Record Linkage System, were also there;  so was Osler Peterson whom I had met briefly when he visited with Jerry Morris, and Paul Densen, whom I had met while I was in Burlington. Osler Peterson and Paul Densen were doing health services research at Harvard, and they invited me to consider a position as director of the liaison group that would link the medical school and school of public health. I flew to Boston, looked the place over, was interviewed by the dean of the Harvard School of Public Health, was offered the position – and provisionally accepted it.

That was before the conference at Airlie House, in the Maryland countryside about an hour’s drive from Dulles Airport. I remember Airlie House fondly because of the fireflies that flickered in the hot summer darkness as we strolled on the paths around the place. That conference was a thinly disguised head-hunting expedition: as many as a dozen of the promising up-and-coming experts of whom I was one, had been invited so we could be looked over by research directors, deans, department heads seeking recruits with specific skills. I was being assessed as a potential recruit to a cross appointment between Harvard Medical School and the Harvard School of Public Health and had already been to Boston and Cambridge, had already provisionally accepted the invitation. 

After the conference ended, almost as an afterthought, I flew on to Ottawa, where I had never been before, because I had received a hand-written invitation to consider a position there also. Although I had provisionally accepted the position at Harvard,  I had misgivings about taking the family back to the USA for what this time would surely be a long stay. Did we really want our children to become American? I had very serious doubts, did not believe we would adjust easily to it.

I arrived in Ottawa about 5.30 pm on a summer evening, having eaten already. I was staying at the old colonial Bytown Inn on the corner of Albert and O’Connor Street, demolished not long after I stayed there. In the long daylight of a summer evening I walked along by the Rideau Canal with the University of Ottawa on the other side of the Canal, turning to head back to the hotel as dusk was falling on a velvety hot night. I walked back to my hotel through quiet tree-lined streets in the Glebe, perhaps along First Avenue  where I live now. It all looked so peaceful: parents sat on their front steps while their children played on the street. What a contrast this was to the menacing atmosphere of Boston with its riots and threats of further assassinations! I had an epiphany, a revelation of the sort that Joseph Smith is said to have experienced when he arrived in the Great Basin of Salt Lake, that “This is the place!” Ottawa would be a better place than Boston to raise our children. I went back to Edinburgh with much to decide, a time of swithering, to use that lovely Scottish word. I felt in my bones that our children’s future in Edinburgh was uncertain. But how was I to decide between Harvard and Ottawa? That was really difficult!

On one hand was the prestige of a great and famous institution and the real challenge, which I recognized and which attracted me, of trying to build a bridge between the medical school and the School of Public Health. This task had frustrated and defeated the excellent man who had just left and whom I would replace. There were many uncertainties, notably the fact that the position was not tenured and the salary was soft money. And there was the fact that we would have to declare our intent to become American citizens, with all that this entailed.

On the other hand, Ottawa had an insignificant and second-rate medical school (third-rate might be more accurate). But it offered abundant opportunities: to become a department chairman and build my own team, to create something where previously there had been nothing. It was in Canada, with values we shared, a prime minister, Pierre Trudeau, whom Wendy and I admired. Yet Canada seemed  hard to identify with. It would be colder than Vermont, and winters would be longer. I would have to learn some French. Could I succeed in building a department? What would happen if I failed? What were the risks? Could we after all stay in Edinburgh, and try again for the promotion to reader next year? Above all, could we face the thought of yet another intercontinental migration to yet another entirely new country? 

There were other options besides Harvard or Ottawa.  Senior academic appointments were mine for the asking in two medical schools south of the border, in England. There were possible openings in the offing in Australia in another year or two, although it was far from clear whether I would be able to secure one of them. All these places, Nottingham, Newcastle, Harvard, the nebulous positions in Australia, would have been, relatively speaking, familiar territory. Ottawa, indeed Canada, was unfamiliar, a country whose culture and traditions we didn’t know. Yet Canada beckoned, seemed to have more to offer than these other possibilities,  if we could tear ourselves away from Edinburgh which all of us had come to love. 

After long deliberation, and with heavy hearts, we decided to move to Ottawa. We began to pack, to sell off, to strip down, preparing for another great leap across a wide ocean. We had been victims of inflation -- everything was costing more, food, public transport, newspapers. We were beneficiaries of inflation when we sold our lovely home for slightly more than double the amount we paid for it less than five years earlier, and thus had a larger amount available as down payment when we bought a home in Ottawa a few months later. Even so, parting from our lovely home, watching people take away items of furniture we'd decided to sell rather than take to Canada, was emotionally traumatic.  I have a lump in my throat as memories come back, most of all the final day at 5 Greenbank Crescent, when I had to drag David away from his bedroom window, both of us crying as we looked for the last time at the glorious view along the Braidburn Park from his bedroom window. For both of us it was a wrenching traumatic experience that we hope never to repeat.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

RMS Titanic 100 years later


 

Has the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic aroused the same nostalgia elsewhere in the world as in Canada? The Canadian connection to this maritime disaster is through Halifax where several hundred drowned victims were buried. The state-of-the-art luxury liner was on her maiden voyage en route to New York on that fatal night of April 14-15, 1912 when she struck an iceberg, began to take on water and three hours later slowly sank in ice cold waters about 3.7 kilometers deep. Of the 2223 people on board, 1514 drowned. There was dramatically higher mortality among Third Class passengers (for whom there were no lifeboats) and crew, than among those traveling First Class.  This maritime disaster happened when British hubris was probably greater than ever before or since. The event is a metaphor for the decline and fall of the British Empire, perhaps for the decline of Western civilization, over the past 100 years.