Pages

Total Pageviews

Sunday, August 5, 2012

ENDINGS

My entry in the 2011 CBC Literary Non-Fiction competition didn't even make it to the short list. Having read most of the entries that did, I can understand why; mine didn't measure up. Here it is:


                                                                        Endings
                                                                                    
            Our society botches the fact that we all die. When I first began to see people die 65 years ago, death often came swiftly: we didn't have intensive care units, and didn't fight vainly against the inevitable.

            Some of those deaths were dreadful. As a medical student in 1947, I looked after a lad exactly my age, 21. An accident crushed his legs. His kidneys shut down and the waste products healthy kidneys deal with were poisoning, soon would kill him. But briefly his mind was clear and he had discovered his predicament. He shouted in rage and terror at being robbed of a life that until then had been an exultant and unalloyed delight.  

            Before dialysis the death of a youngster from kidney failure may have been the hardest to watch helplessly from the sidelines. That fate befell an occasional pregnant woman. Terminating the pregnancy could save her. When abortion was illegal except in such dire circumstances, deciding whether to intervene to save the mother's life was probably our toughest ethical problem. I don't envy my young colleagues: the ethical and moral problems at the beginning and end of life are more complex and troubling than when I was their age.

            We’ve taken pointless postponing of the inevitable to extremes that would be farcical if they weren't a perversion of what the caring professions should be about. Death is put off for many by mere weeks. Economists say more than half of all lifetime personal medical expense often occurs in the last weeks of life. It's called expenditure on health care but it's sick care, an investment in care of the terminally ill. I'm not suggesting it’s a waste of money, but it ought to be spent with compassion and common sense and often it isn't. It isn’t compassionate to prolong dying by poking tubes into every body orifice, making extra holes to insert devices, drip fluids and pharmaceuticals into veins and arteries, to force air into lungs that only want to rest after a lifetime of work. It isn't compassionate when loving ones can't talk to each other because the paraphernalia of life support systems make speech impossible. It isn't compassionate when dying is painful, as it may be despite pain-suppressing drugs. If the drugs deaden pain they often cloud consciousness, a delicate, difficult balance.  I have a "living will," with explicit instructions that no one shall do futile things to me, but will I want to talk if it’s painful? I’ll have to decide, if I face that fate some day.

            Does refusal to admit defeat lead physicians to deploy such weaponry? Some members of my profession can't concede that the forces of nature are more powerful than they are. We doctors are an arrogant lot, so sure we know what's best, yet often wrong.

            Human nature is ultimately responsible, not the doctors. Loving ones want to cling to the last spark of life, don't want to hear if told that it’s kinder to allow Death in. The grief of bereavement is a universal human quality, something we all experience when those we cherish are taken from us, grief we prefer to postpone. A core value of our culture is that every life is precious until its end, so we delay that end as long as we can.

            Are these values immutable? Recalling my childhood, I'm struck by changes in values in my lifetime, perhaps related to changes in family structure and function. When I was a child, most families were large and close-knit; we made our own entertainment, we supported one another in hardship or crisis; we took care of our own frail elderly. Divorce was rare and stigmatizing, unmarried mothers were outcasts. Now most families are small, often scattered, single motherhood by choice, unmarried couples living together, divorce and remarriage, and depositing elderly relatives in retirement homes, are commonplace and socially acceptable.

            As the baby boomers grow old in a restlessly mobile society of fragmented families, many may lack frequent contact with, or easy access to close kin. Some have no kin. Instead of the networks that united families and occupied their leisure time, they may have only television and the internet for company. Relatively few may have adequate resources and social safety nets after a lifetime of precarious employment without pension plans. Will many die alone, unloved? Or will values change with demographic realities? Aging boomers and the generations who come after them will have to confront these questions. They may be less inclined than we are to postpone death, to invest in the frail elderly. They might entertain the notions of assisted suicide and euthanasia.

            We can rejoice when death is timely, celebrate a life well lived, be thankful for all that the dead one accomplished.

            My father lived a long life and enjoyed it with gusto until his mid-80s when things began to fall apart. His intellect was intact to the end but he lost his sight and balance, his supple joints and strong muscles, control of his bladder and bowel. He was infantilized: diapered, washed and fed like a baby.  To a fiercely independent man this loss of autonomy was the hardest affliction to endure. He didn't lose his sense of humour though, and developed ability to curse colourfully at his worsening infirmities. He died in a foreign land, Malta, a tax haven where he had come to rest a few years before, with no family close by, and funeral rites of a religion he had scorned -- he was a sincere and blasphemous atheist.

            It was a bitter cold day for a funeral, the first day of a new year with snow almost to sea level on Sicily, whence the penetrating north wind blew. There were glitches. In the service in the nursing home where he died, the priest's remarks were accompanied by electronic carol music that couldn't be turned off, and the most solemn parts were intoned to the tunes of Jingle bells and Rudolph the red-nosed reindeer, bringing giggles from acquaintances who accompanied me, the sole family mourner. There was another hitch when time came to lay his coffin to rest. The attendants, short-staffed because it was a holiday, were placing another coffin in its niche in a distant part of the cemetery and kept us awaiting the burial service for twenty minutes. I was shuddering with cold by then.

            No wake then, but a splendid one a few months later on a sunny day in Los Angeles among friends who had worked with him at the University of California for twenty years after he retired from his Chair in London. Throughout it all, from the cold New Year's Day in Malta to the comfort of the UCLA campus, there was relief that my father's travail was over, and rejoicing at all he had accomplished in his long and interesting life.

            My wife, my best friend, my lover for 55 years, died last year of ALS. This is a horrible fate for a younger person but in her mid-80s it was a gentle process that lasted just over a year from diagnosis to death. She had no pain, her mind was intact, she stayed home, and we knew how her illness would end in sleep from which she would not awake. I was with her throughout and we had compassionate, skilled care. We shared jokes and DVDs of our favourite television programs. When swallowing became a problem, our son-in-law, a gourmet cook, pureed and froze delectable dishes that we thawed and reheated for her dining pleasure. Our small Canadian family rallied around, our larger networks in New Zealand and Australia stayed in touch by phone and e-mail until the end of her life. She died with our children and me around her bed, each in turn holding her hands.

Selflessly altruistic to the end, she donated her body to the medical school so she had no funeral but a few months later our family and over 100 of her friends celebrated her life. She had touched us all through her dedicated volunteer activities and innumerable acts of kindness and words of comfort. She lightened the lives of everyone she met, and many confirmed this with their anecdotes at the celebration of her life. It was a cheerful, fulfilling day for all of us.  

            We don't fully die while others remember us happily. John Keats, aged 26, abandoned his rotting body when the bacilli of tuberculosis had consumed so much it was no longer habitable, but his soaring spirit will be with us as long as people read his poems. Our culture is rich with immortal reminders of creative artists of every kind; and original, creative scientists too. We lesser mortals have a little deathlessness meted out if those who are left remember us, hold happy mementos of our existence. Nobody should need to ask for more.
            

No comments:

Post a Comment