Pages

Total Pageviews

Friday, August 31, 2012

We didn't have the green thing back then

Wendy's nephew Ivon Hurst has a farm at Pleasant Point, South Canterbury, New Zealand.  He sent me this, which evokes many memories.  I resonate to the older lady's sentiments!


Checking out at the store, the young cashier
suggested to the older  woman that she should
bring her own shopping bags  because plastic
bags weren't good for the  environment. The
woman apologized and  explained,"We  didn't
have this green thing back in my earlier  days."

The cashier responded, "That's our  problem
today. Your generation did not care enough  to
save our environment for future  generations."

She was right -- our generation  didn't have the
green thing in its day. Back then,  we returned
milk bottles, pop bottles and beer  bottles to the
store. The store sent them back to  the plant to
be washed and sterilized and refilled,  so it could use the same bottles over and over. So  they really were recycled. We refilled writing pens  with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we  replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of  throwing away the whole razor just because the blade  got dull.  

But we didn't have  the green thing back in our day.

We  walked up stairs, because we didn't have an escalator in every shop and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go  two blocks. But she was right.
We didn't have the green thing in our day.
Back then, we washed the baby's  nappies because we didn't have the throw-away kind.  We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy  gobbling machine burning up 220 volts -- wind and  solar power really did dry our clothes back in our  early days. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their  brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing.  But that young lady is right.
We didn't have the green thing  back in our day.
Back then, we had one TV, or radio, in the house -- not a TV in every  room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a  handkerchief (remember handkerchiefs?) not a screen the size of Yorkshire. In the kitchen, we  blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have  electric machines to do everything for us. When we  packaged a fragile item to send in the post, we used  wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not  Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap. Back then, we  didn't fire up an engine and burn petrol just to cut  the lawn. We used a push
mower that ran on human  power. We exercised by working so we didn't need to  go to a health club to run on treadmills that  operate on electricity. But she's right. 
We didn't have the green thing back  then.

We drank water from the tap when we were thirsty, instead  of so-called pure spring water from a plastic bottle. A lot of food was seasonal and we didn't expect fresh fruit all year round flown in from thousands of air miles away. We cooked food that didn't come out of a tin, a packet, or plastic wrap. We even washed our own vegetables and chopped our own salad.
But we didn't have the green thing back then.
Back then, people  took the tram or a bus, and kids rode their bikes to  school or walked instead of turning their mothers  into a 24-hour taxi service. We had one electrical  outlet in a room, not a bank of sockets to  power a dozen appliances. And we didn't need a computerized phone to receive a signal from  satellites 2,000 miles out in space in order to find  the nearest pizza joint.

But isn't it sad that the  current generation

laments how wasteful we old  folks were just
because we didn't have the green  thing back then?

Please forward this to  another selfish old

person who needs a lesson in  conservation from
a young person.


Remember: Don't  make old people mad. We don't
 like being old in the first  place, so it doesn't take much to piss us  off; and there are lots and lots of us, more every day.      
 
 

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Popular music

I have the radio on most of the time.  Talk radio, the CBC, which despite the vicious cuts the current government has made - clearly intended to kill the public broadcasting network - carries enough intellectually stimulating material aimed at grown-ups to satisfy me for much of the time. It's intelligent company and it helps to keep my brain functioning. Some time last week I heard a discussion about the music of the early 20th century that sparked a train of thought about the importance of music in my life - in anybody's life for that matter, but it's the role of music in my own life that I want to talk about today.

My earliest memories include snatches of ballads from late Victorian and Edwardian times and the rousing but often sad songs of the Great War of 1914-18, all of this of course written as much as several decades before I was born, but still popular when I was a small child. I heard these songs on wind-up gramophones that were part of the furniture in many homes in those years.  By the middle 1930s, music on the radio, another rather large piece of furniture, removed to a distance the silences between snatches of music as the record was changed and the clockwork motor rewound. Sometimes the radio could broadcast a live orchestral concert with a whole symphony uninterrupted, but most music came on vinyl records with a diameter proportional to playing time so the music played in rationed chunks of 3 to 5 minutes, the physical limits of 78 rpm vinyl records. In that way I heard a great deal of the popular music of a time that is on average around 100 years in the past. That merged and mingled with the popular music of the 1930s and 1940s, the years of the world war that I experienced as a child and adolescent youth.

That music had substance. It wasn't timeless classical music, just ephemeral popular music, but it had two qualities that have vanished altogether from the the cacophonous noise that contemporary radio announcers describe as music. That music had recognizable tunes and sometimes had words that were mellifluously arranged and worth hearing. Rarely, the words - lyrics - were poetry. Not very good poetry perhaps, but genuine poetry nonetheless with verses, rhyming couplets, stanzas. Some composers of that golden age worked in partnerships with versifiers, as Arthur Sullivan did with William S Gilbert. A few, like Noel Coward and Cole Porter, combined both roles with wit and panache.  It puzzles - and frustrates - me that they have no modern successors. If I listen carefully, I can very rarely discern sense in the words that are chanted as accompaniment to one of the contemporary barbarities, rap or hip-hop, but only so rarely that it's not worth enduring in the almost always vain hope that it will be worth hearing.

Why has this happened?  Why don't modern youngsters have tastes like the young people of 50, 75 or 100 years ago, eager to listen to, and appreciative of, tuneful ballads and songs worth hearing?  It's one of the great mysteries of modern life to me, and it has blighted my old age that I so rarely hear the songs I once loved, and that nothing has come along to replace or reinforce them.

Monday, August 20, 2012

Tolerance of ambiguity

I'd have labeled this post "Multiple shades of grey"but a title close to this has been used in a best selling raunchy novel recently, so that phrase is off limits, temporarily at least. I believe I have always had a high degree of tolerance of ambiguity. Should I leap into this current topic of discussion to demonstrate my tolerance? Probably not, but I'll do it anyway. An anatomically and physiologically female person who is psychologically male had gender reassignment surgery; then he and his partner decided to have a child.  The only feasible way for this to happen was for the gender reassigned male to stop taking testosterone and become pregnant. After a normal pregnancy and birth, the psychologically male "mother" has successfully breastfed his son for 18 months, and has been providing emotional support and practical advice to other mothers at the MCH clinic he attends. He had breast reduction surgery but fortunately at least some breast tissue and mammary glands were left in situ, apparently enabling him to produce copious amounts of breast milk. Now he wants to volunteer as a counsellor to mothers who are having difficulty breast feeding.  He has run into road blocks from La Leche League, the voluntary organization that promotes breast feeding.  La Leche League is quite a progressive organization in many ways. When I used to set up a range of community services, agencies, organizations, etc, to which I could send medical students, La Leche league was among them, and in my experience they seldom advocated positions that I'd have vetoed as reactionary. However, they evidently can't accept the notion of a trans-gender person who is now reassigned as male but is successfully breast-feeding his 18 month old infant son who is thriving on his father's breast milk. Admittedly it's a hard notion to assimilate. But in the increasingly tolerant, laid-back nation that is Canada in 2012, I think they ought to get used to the notion.

Gender identity was explored on CBC radio several times today, in news reports and discussions on talk radio about the breast-feeding "father," then in the Ideas program, which reran a program about gender identity in infancy - and attempts by well meaning parents to avoid what they regard as gender stereotyping. I was reminded of the appalling Irene in Alexander McCall Smith's perceptive tales about the occupants of the flats at 44 Scotland Street in Edinburgh. Irene made her 6 year old son Bertie wear pink dungarees as one of many actions aimed at avoiding gender stereotyping.  A new book in the 44 Scotland Street series awaits my attention on my bedside table; it's probably too much to hope that Irene gets her comeuppance in this new book, but I hope Bertie has a chance to escape Irene's relentless attempts to prevent him becoming a small boy. Well-meaning but I think misguided parents in Toronto have named their children Storm, Jazz, and Kio, in an attempt to avoid labeling them with names that identify their sex.  When David was about 9 months old, he dismantled his pram, managed somehow to unscrew every nut and bolt that was unscrewable. Was this a typically small boy or small girl action? Would he have refrained from this and other boyish acts like climbing ladders, trees and the rotary clothes hoist if he had a gender-neutral name? What about the father who wouldn't allow his toddler son to play with a pink soccer ball, insisted that he kick only the blue ball? That sort of  parental behaviour is just absurd.

Ambiguous gender identity in adolescence and early adult life is a very heavy burden to carry. I wish I could do more to help a young person I know who is coping with this burden - coping rather well now I believe, but other than some counselling I don't think anything much is being provided or offered to help my friend, who at least knows I'm ready, willing and I hope able to help whenever I'm asked.

Saturday, August 18, 2012

A Day Trip in Bengal


This story begins over breakfast at Chateau Montebello, half way between Ottawa and Montreal, on a February day in 1982. There was a conference on medical education, attended by eminent overseas authorities, including Sir Douglas Black, president of the Royal College of Physicians, He was the principal author of the Black Report, on Inequalities in Health.  I'd known him for many years; we have mutual friends whom I wanted to ask about, notably Jerry Morris, my mentor at the MRC Social Medicine Research Unit in 1961-62. On the last morning of the conference, I joined him for breakfast.  He and Jerry were life-long friends, he a son of the manse, Jerry the son of a rabbi, both reared in Gorbals, the Glasgow slums, both with the permanent reminder of this in their thick Glasgow accents. As I sipped my tea, I popped a Chloroquin tablet into my mouth and swallowed it, but not quickly enough to avoid the bitter taste. It made me grimace, and, noticing, he raised his eyebrows. I murmured, "Chloroquin."  He remarked drily, looking at the hard frozen snow outside, that this was hardly the time or place to be taking antimalarials. I told him that the next time I sat down to breakfast, I would be in Calcutta.

That statement proved to be close, but not quite accurate. That afternoon, I hitched a ride to Mirabel Airport for my long flights to Calcutta via Heathrow and Dubai.  I arrived at Dum Dum, the airport outside Calcutta in late afternoon of a pleasant sunny day; Professor N.S. Deodhar met the flight. He was another old friend. We drove into Calcutta in a VW van escorted by soldiers on motor cycles, carrying rifles. Bandits were active in the area around the airport, so this was a sensible precaution. Deodhar said on the way to my hotel that he would leave me to get a good night's rest, and would collect me at 5 am sharp next morning, to take me to see a new rural health centre. At first I thought he said 9 am, but after he had repeated it a few times, it sank in - he really was planning to collect me at 5 am. I had been travelling for about seventeen hours in the air and several more on the ground, across ten time zones; I knew I wanted nothing so badly as a good night's sleep, and wanted nothing less than to get up at 5 am. But it sounded like an interesting day in store, if I could survive it.

The Oberoi Calcutta is a rambling old colonial bungalow style hotel, set behind high stone walls. My suite of rooms was at the back, far from the noise of the busy shopping street in front. My windows, ten feet above a narrow lane, were barred and covered by mosquito-proof wire mesh screens. Before I went to bed, I looked out on this microcosm of Calcutta street life. Two girls about 10-12 years old paraded shamelessly and cheerfully back and forth trying to attract hotel guests, holding the hems of their short skirts up under their armpits whenever they thought someone was looking at them, rolling their naked hips lasciviously, flashing white teeth through scarlet, heavily made up lips. They were the youngest prostitutes I had ever seen. Further along the lane were cooking fires and mats where people lived, a few of the half million or so citizens of Calcutta who have no other home but the street. A few days later when I was coming back from a shopping expedition, I came up the two steps at the gate in front of the Oberoi Calcutta, and had to step over a dead baby, that probably had been alive when somebody left it there half an hour or so before. Calcutta is a good place to see life and death in the raw.

True to his word, Professor Deodhar collected me, more dead than alive, at 5 am. It was still dark, and I had been woken by the room-boy half an hour before, at 4.30 am, seemingly just moments after I had fallen asleep. I had had time only for a long shower and a cup of scalding hot tea, hadn't felt able to face the fried eggs that came with it. A pleasant surprise awaited me in the VW van: as well as Professor Deodhar and one of his colleagues, there was another old friend, Zbigniew Brzeziński, escaping from a Warsaw winter. I often seem to run into him in tropical parts of the world when it is winter in Poland. We had some fine and civilized conversation that morning as we drove across the plains of Bengal. I was working then on the first edition of the Dictionary of Epidemiology. Zbigniew challenged me about the definition of "epidemiology" that I had circulated not long before this to about 30 eminent epidemiologists around the world including his colleague in Warsaw, the former IEA president Jan Kostrzewski. The final clause in the definition of epidemiology,  "... and the application of this study to the control of health problems," is there because Zbigniew persuaded me that morning as we sat in the back of the VW bus: as an abstract study, an end it itself, epidemiology is sterile - its purpose is to control health problems, and this must be spelt out in the definition. Later I successfully defended this argument in debates with some academicians who said epidemiology is a pure science. So the wording of that definition is a permanent reminder of what turned out to be a memorable day. 

We stopped for breakfast about 8 am, at a rather shabby but graceful government rest house, one of the many relics of colonial India to be seen in those parts. So my remark to Douglas Black about sitting down to my next breakfast in Calcutta was only out by about 120 Km, though a world away in tranquillity and, of course, empty of bustling throngs of people.  And a very good, nourishing breakfast it was too, fresh hot buttered toast, eggs and bacon (for us two meat-eaters) and tasty, spicy Bengali rice patties.  

Much of the remainder of the outbound journey is blurred: jet-lag caught up with me, and I fell asleep several times, despite Zbigniew Brzezeński's diligent efforts to keep me awake and talking. He believed, correctly, that it's best to stay awake when the sun is up, to get over jet-lag as rapidly as possible. I awoke around 11 am, just before we reached our destination, the health centre that Professor Deodhar was planning to show us.  

I think Zbigniew, who had been in Calcutta a few weeks already, was almost as surprised as I was, to discover that we weren't there to see a new rural community health centre, but rather to see where it would be when it had been built. We were part of the official party that would preside over the opening ceremonies before the first spade was turned for the foundations to be laid.

It was quite a large official party: representatives from the national government in Delhi, the state government and the local government of that part of Bengal, the national and local health departments, and Professor N.S. Deodhar, in his capacity as Director of the All-India Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, in Calcutta... and Professor Deodhar's two distinguished overseas visitors, who had come all the way from Canada and Poland, just for this occasion. I didn't know this at the time, though I heard Zbigniew's name and mine as one of  the introductory speeches was made in Hindi or Bengali. We were all seated on a specially erected open-air stage, in front of a great sea of brown faces of dignitaries and local citizens, several hundred who had assembled for the occasion (or for the free meal that came after it). I was seated near the end of the front row on the stage, nodding off from time to time despite the fact that I seemed to be the focus of so much attention, as was Zbigniew - our pale faces in sharp contrast to the prevailing browns.

Suddenly Professor Deodhar jogged my elbow, having crept along behind the row of seats from his place near the middle, to whisper in my ear, that it was my turn now to make a speech. Make a speech? Me? On what, why, for how long??? My recollections of the next few minutes are confused. I recall standing (swaying a little from side to side as though drunk) at the microphone. I must have said something. Perhaps I said how intimately entwined primary care and public health must always be, especially in rural community health centres. I wished the new health centre success and its staff happiness... something like that. It felt like a very long time, or like a few seconds, it's hard to say which, before honour was satisfied and I slunk back to my seat, shuddering. Zbigniew was better prepared than I; no doubt he had been awake when Deodhar told him a speech would be expected of him, and he had had time to prepare something. He spoke, however, in Polish! He told me later that as nobody would understand he could say anything; anyway, there had already been speeches in Hindi, Bengali, perhaps Urdu, and of course English (and my Australian) maybe other languages for all we knew. He has a fine sense of humour and he enjoyed the Polish joke he told, even if nobody else did. 

Then there was a large lunch, with lots of those tasty and spicy Indian dishes, which I gobbled hungrily. I don't know what my stomach was expecting to get or what time zone it thought it was in, but it certainly got a pleasant surprise, and set to work digesting it all, fortunately successfully and without mishap. Having slept part of the way out, I hadn't realized how far we had travelled; it was actually about a five-hour drive from Calcutta to the village where the new community health centre was to be built. Now we had to turn about and go back to Calcutta. My heart sank when I realized towards the end of the long lunch that we faced a five hour drive. As soon as I knew this, I was eager to get on the way. My bed was calling me, and I knew that ProfessorDeodhar expected me to give a lecture and a seminar at the All India Institute the next day. Finally we set off on the return journey about 4 pm. So I would be in bed by about 10 or soon after, if all went smoothly. But all didn't go smoothly. 

Although I was wide awake now, it being according to my internal clock about getting-up time, we were all rather quiet. I was enjoying the scenery, the teeming life in the villages through which we passed, the open, slightly undulating countryside with trees, ponds here and there, many rivers, water buffalo, and the ubiquitous cows, scraggy greyish white nondescript animals sacred to Hindus, that wander everywhere in India, even in the bustling heart of huge cities like Calcutta. Soon, too soon, it got dark. Sunsets are spectacular, but twilights are short in that equatorial part of the world; now all we saw were occasional trees close to the road, flashing by in the rather dim headlights; and villages in many of which there seemed to be no electricity, just oil lamps and open fires. I was finding the ride increasingly bumpy, the seats over the back wheels of the VW bus increasingly uncomfortable. 

The driver too became aware of the bumpiness, and stopped the car. We had a very flat tire, on which he had been driving for some time - indeed, we were driving on the rim, no wonder it felt so bumpy. We all got out while the driver set about changing the wheel, which was fairly soon accomplished with the aid of a reasonably efficient flashlight. So far so good. But as soon as he let the weight of the car subside on to the spare wheel, it too proved to be flat. We all could see the great rent in it - perhaps it also had been driven too long after it went flat. 

We had stopped between villages, out in the open countryside. There had been no electric lights in any of the last few villages we had passed through. Would there be any, and more important, any auto repair works, in the next village on our way? Professor Deodhar and his colleague conferred with the driver in whatever language they had in common, Bengali I suppose. No cars had gone by since we had stopped. Zbigniew and I were dismayed by this turn of events, Deodhar clearly  was embarrassed and discomforted by our predicament. Anyway, he and his colleague (whose name I have forgotten) and the driver reached a decision. The driver set off on foot, trundling the less badly afflicted of the two wheels, hoping to hitch a ride as soon as possible, to get to the first town along our way where the tire could be repaired. Professor Deodhar, his colleague, Zbigniew and I, got back into the VW van, where at least we could sit down, to wait, for what I gloomily thought would be many hours if not all night long. There was very little conversation. Zbigniew asked whether we would be likely to get back to Calcutta that night, and how could he tell his wife, whom I knew to be a worrier, what was happening. Deodhar answered that he didn't know. 

I became increasingly conscious of two things. The first and more important was that I was very, very thirsty. I had had several cups of tea at lunch time, as well as some fluid when we stopped for breakfast on the outward journey. I felt very parched and dehydrated, so much so that my voice sounded odd when I asked plaintively if we had anything to drink in the car. "Of course," said Professor Deodhar or his colleague - but we hadn't, someone had forgotten to refill the thermos flasks we had brought from Calcutta; all but one were empty, and that one provided no more than a mouthful each for those who wanted it, of nearly cold, very strong tea. I gulped down my ration gratefully, but it hardly touched the sides. The other thing I became conscious of were many whining mosquitoes, and the fact that quite a lot of them were biting me. Were they anopheline or culex? I asked Deodhar, who reassured me that we were in a malaria-free region. I doubted this, and was thankful that I had started Chloroquin a couple of weeks before. But suppose they were culex? Was dengue, or Japanese B encephalitis prevalent in the area? Zbigniew had worked a good deal in malarial areas for WHO in earlier years. Professor Deodhar is a world authority on tropical diseases. I was diffident about exposing my ignorance in front of these experts, so I didn't ask the questions that were bubbling into my mind. I pulled down my sleeves, made sure no flesh was exposed between my shoes and my trousers, minimizing the target the mosquitoes could strike, and settled into a sulky silence.

It felt like an eternity, but perhaps was no more than an hour, before the driver was back, driven back in a truck, with the wheel repaired. Sometimes things get done surprisingly rapidly in India. He soon had it back on the car, and we were on our way. The next town along our road back to Calcutta was quite large, as we saw when we came to it; there had been no difficulty at all getting the tire mended there; and when we came to it, Professor Deodhar and the driver agreed that the other wheel should be made road-worthy too. We parked at the garage for this to be done. 

Across the street, festooned with little fairy lights, was a stall selling bottled soda water. Oh Joy! My terrible thirst could be satisfied. We began to walk towards it. Perhaps the others were better dark-adapted than I, certainly they were not jet-lagged. They saw, I didn't, the deep ditch, an open sewer, about a foot across and a foot deep, that lay between us and the soda-pop stall. Suddenly, there was no solid ground under one of my feet, and I splashed up to mid-calf in this stinking mess of raw sewage. I was lucky not to break any bones, not even the skin surface, which could have been serious enough - who knows what lethal pathogens may have lurked in that putrid stuff? There was a stand-pipe and tap beside the soft drink stall, and there we washed off the worst of the foul-smelling ordure that had filled my shoe, soaked my sock, and the bottom six inches or so of my trouser leg. I was past caring anyway. But the others weren't, when we got back into the car. Even with all the windows down to let the air circulate freely, I did not smell very nice. Zbigniew sat as far away as he could for the rest of the journey back to Calcutta, which took another two hours or more...  I was in bed soon after midnight and had perhaps the best sleep of my life.

The rest of the story is more cheerful.  Hotels like the Oberoi Calcutta offer a wide range of services, shoe-cleaning of course, and dry-cleaning. Next morning in my shining clean shoes, my other trousers, clean socks, shirt and tie, I felt decidedly better when Professor Deodhar's driver collected me around mid-morning. My lecture had been moved to a more civilized time slot just before lunch, my seminar postponed to the following day. All was forgiven. But sometimes when colleagues in the comfort of Ottawa speak enviously about glamorous international travel, I wonder how they would have reacted to that memorable day trip in Bengal.

Friday, August 10, 2012

Games

The Games of the XXX Olympiad of the modern era are almost over.  I've enjoyed watching some of the spectacle very much. I saw enough of the opening ceremony to make me feel that I want to see the entire ceremony, and dropped a hint to my kids that if they are stuck for ideas for a birthday present, a DVD of this would be welcome. The parts of the opening ceremony that I saw showed the Brits at their self-deprecating best. No other nation seems to have the same comfortable enjoyment of poking fun at themselves, as the Brits clearly do; and this self-mockery was skillfully interwoven with scenes of British triumphs, Shakespeare, the industrial revolution, the National Health Service, and capping it all, Tim Berners-Lee giving his creation, the world wide web, freely, to the world - no copyright, no royalties every time it's used, just a free gift to all humankind.  It's almost impossible to imagine anybody from any other nation giving away such immense potential wealth. Alexander Fleming's gift of penicillin to the world was another example of the British at their altruistic best, although I didn't see any commemoration of this great discovery during the opening ceremony.  Perhaps it was there, like Harry Potter, and Dr Who and the Daleks, while I wasn't watching. I missed the first hour or so of the televised performance. As for the games, there was Usain Bolt from Jamaica, a superb sprinter and a great showman, Michael Phelps, a magnificent swimmer, David Rudesha winning the 800 meters in record time, and the highlight for me, the Canadian women's football (soccer) team who outplayed the Americans and would have won convincingly were it not for several appalling decisions by the referee, who penalized the Canadians several times and was blind to worse violations by the Americans. One especially egregious and erroneous decision by the referee ultimately determined the outcome of the match. My admittedly partisan opinion about this was unanimously shared by the commentators, even the American ones. Another referee showed similar bias in the match for the gold medal which the Americans won only because the referee failed to penalize them for blatant violations against the technically superior Japanese side. But enough already of my whining. Another impressive aspect that I've noted before has been the fact that many of these superb athletes are obviously also intelligent and articulate, able to communicate clearly in well-chosen words, even in a language that isn't their mother tongue. Like many other people, I'm perplexed that some events are regarded as olympic sports, sports of any kind if it come to that, for example synchronized swimming, beach volleyball, trampoline (although a Canadian girl got Canada's only gold medal in this event).  And many times I longed for the advertising-free BBC, rather than the ad-infested TV that is the only kind available here. I didn't time it, but advertising must have occupied at least an order of magnitude more time than the broadcasting of the sporting events themselves. It's ironic too that the greater part of the advertising time was taken up with ads for MacDonald's fast foods and cola cola.  It would be hard to imagine two kinds of foodstuffs less healthful than these! It's churlish to be critical, however.  The spectacle has been well worth seeing, even if I had to endure such a plethora of advertising breaks.

An afterthought: Sometime during the games there was a news item about condoms, specifically, about the prodigious number provided and presumably used at each of the past few Olympic Games.  I was reminded of this by several vignettes at these games. There were the teams of women sprinters joyfully embracing each other after the women's sprint relay, each team exuding sexuality that almost made the pheromones perceptible through the TV screen. I had a momentary vision of the revelry and romping that I imagine went on that night in the Olympic Village...  At the TV presentation of the Closing Ceremony the emphasis was on the spectacle but from time to time the camera zoomed in on the athletes, all relaxed and thoroughly enjoying themselves, their competitions over and done, but the assortative mating beginning in earnest.  What a superb selection of the best of the human race was at play here! The sight set me wondering what the world might be like nine months from now if there really was a night of assortative mating without condoms when this celebration ended.  I think the world might be a better place, because so often athletic superiority is matched by intellectual superiority.  The sum total might be a significant increase in the proportion of excellent humans in the world.   It's an  attractive dream.

Sunday, August 5, 2012

ENDINGS

My entry in the 2011 CBC Literary Non-Fiction competition didn't even make it to the short list. Having read most of the entries that did, I can understand why; mine didn't measure up. Here it is:


                                                                        Endings
                                                                                    
            Our society botches the fact that we all die. When I first began to see people die 65 years ago, death often came swiftly: we didn't have intensive care units, and didn't fight vainly against the inevitable.

            Some of those deaths were dreadful. As a medical student in 1947, I looked after a lad exactly my age, 21. An accident crushed his legs. His kidneys shut down and the waste products healthy kidneys deal with were poisoning, soon would kill him. But briefly his mind was clear and he had discovered his predicament. He shouted in rage and terror at being robbed of a life that until then had been an exultant and unalloyed delight.  

            Before dialysis the death of a youngster from kidney failure may have been the hardest to watch helplessly from the sidelines. That fate befell an occasional pregnant woman. Terminating the pregnancy could save her. When abortion was illegal except in such dire circumstances, deciding whether to intervene to save the mother's life was probably our toughest ethical problem. I don't envy my young colleagues: the ethical and moral problems at the beginning and end of life are more complex and troubling than when I was their age.

            We’ve taken pointless postponing of the inevitable to extremes that would be farcical if they weren't a perversion of what the caring professions should be about. Death is put off for many by mere weeks. Economists say more than half of all lifetime personal medical expense often occurs in the last weeks of life. It's called expenditure on health care but it's sick care, an investment in care of the terminally ill. I'm not suggesting it’s a waste of money, but it ought to be spent with compassion and common sense and often it isn't. It isn’t compassionate to prolong dying by poking tubes into every body orifice, making extra holes to insert devices, drip fluids and pharmaceuticals into veins and arteries, to force air into lungs that only want to rest after a lifetime of work. It isn't compassionate when loving ones can't talk to each other because the paraphernalia of life support systems make speech impossible. It isn't compassionate when dying is painful, as it may be despite pain-suppressing drugs. If the drugs deaden pain they often cloud consciousness, a delicate, difficult balance.  I have a "living will," with explicit instructions that no one shall do futile things to me, but will I want to talk if it’s painful? I’ll have to decide, if I face that fate some day.

            Does refusal to admit defeat lead physicians to deploy such weaponry? Some members of my profession can't concede that the forces of nature are more powerful than they are. We doctors are an arrogant lot, so sure we know what's best, yet often wrong.

            Human nature is ultimately responsible, not the doctors. Loving ones want to cling to the last spark of life, don't want to hear if told that it’s kinder to allow Death in. The grief of bereavement is a universal human quality, something we all experience when those we cherish are taken from us, grief we prefer to postpone. A core value of our culture is that every life is precious until its end, so we delay that end as long as we can.

            Are these values immutable? Recalling my childhood, I'm struck by changes in values in my lifetime, perhaps related to changes in family structure and function. When I was a child, most families were large and close-knit; we made our own entertainment, we supported one another in hardship or crisis; we took care of our own frail elderly. Divorce was rare and stigmatizing, unmarried mothers were outcasts. Now most families are small, often scattered, single motherhood by choice, unmarried couples living together, divorce and remarriage, and depositing elderly relatives in retirement homes, are commonplace and socially acceptable.

            As the baby boomers grow old in a restlessly mobile society of fragmented families, many may lack frequent contact with, or easy access to close kin. Some have no kin. Instead of the networks that united families and occupied their leisure time, they may have only television and the internet for company. Relatively few may have adequate resources and social safety nets after a lifetime of precarious employment without pension plans. Will many die alone, unloved? Or will values change with demographic realities? Aging boomers and the generations who come after them will have to confront these questions. They may be less inclined than we are to postpone death, to invest in the frail elderly. They might entertain the notions of assisted suicide and euthanasia.

            We can rejoice when death is timely, celebrate a life well lived, be thankful for all that the dead one accomplished.

            My father lived a long life and enjoyed it with gusto until his mid-80s when things began to fall apart. His intellect was intact to the end but he lost his sight and balance, his supple joints and strong muscles, control of his bladder and bowel. He was infantilized: diapered, washed and fed like a baby.  To a fiercely independent man this loss of autonomy was the hardest affliction to endure. He didn't lose his sense of humour though, and developed ability to curse colourfully at his worsening infirmities. He died in a foreign land, Malta, a tax haven where he had come to rest a few years before, with no family close by, and funeral rites of a religion he had scorned -- he was a sincere and blasphemous atheist.

            It was a bitter cold day for a funeral, the first day of a new year with snow almost to sea level on Sicily, whence the penetrating north wind blew. There were glitches. In the service in the nursing home where he died, the priest's remarks were accompanied by electronic carol music that couldn't be turned off, and the most solemn parts were intoned to the tunes of Jingle bells and Rudolph the red-nosed reindeer, bringing giggles from acquaintances who accompanied me, the sole family mourner. There was another hitch when time came to lay his coffin to rest. The attendants, short-staffed because it was a holiday, were placing another coffin in its niche in a distant part of the cemetery and kept us awaiting the burial service for twenty minutes. I was shuddering with cold by then.

            No wake then, but a splendid one a few months later on a sunny day in Los Angeles among friends who had worked with him at the University of California for twenty years after he retired from his Chair in London. Throughout it all, from the cold New Year's Day in Malta to the comfort of the UCLA campus, there was relief that my father's travail was over, and rejoicing at all he had accomplished in his long and interesting life.

            My wife, my best friend, my lover for 55 years, died last year of ALS. This is a horrible fate for a younger person but in her mid-80s it was a gentle process that lasted just over a year from diagnosis to death. She had no pain, her mind was intact, she stayed home, and we knew how her illness would end in sleep from which she would not awake. I was with her throughout and we had compassionate, skilled care. We shared jokes and DVDs of our favourite television programs. When swallowing became a problem, our son-in-law, a gourmet cook, pureed and froze delectable dishes that we thawed and reheated for her dining pleasure. Our small Canadian family rallied around, our larger networks in New Zealand and Australia stayed in touch by phone and e-mail until the end of her life. She died with our children and me around her bed, each in turn holding her hands.

Selflessly altruistic to the end, she donated her body to the medical school so she had no funeral but a few months later our family and over 100 of her friends celebrated her life. She had touched us all through her dedicated volunteer activities and innumerable acts of kindness and words of comfort. She lightened the lives of everyone she met, and many confirmed this with their anecdotes at the celebration of her life. It was a cheerful, fulfilling day for all of us.  

            We don't fully die while others remember us happily. John Keats, aged 26, abandoned his rotting body when the bacilli of tuberculosis had consumed so much it was no longer habitable, but his soaring spirit will be with us as long as people read his poems. Our culture is rich with immortal reminders of creative artists of every kind; and original, creative scientists too. We lesser mortals have a little deathlessness meted out if those who are left remember us, hold happy mementos of our existence. Nobody should need to ask for more.